Iran, Israel and the U.S.: The Slide To War

Iran, Israel & the U.S.: The Slide To War

Dispatches From The Edge

Feb. 22, 2012

Wars are fought because some people decide it is in their interests to fight them. World War I was not started over the Archduke Ferdinand’s assassination, nor was it triggered by the alliance system. An “incident” may set the stage for war, but no one keeps shooting unless they think it’s a good idea. The Great War started because the countries involved decided they would profit by it, delusional as that conclusion was.

It is useful to keep this idea in mind when trying to figure out if there will be a war with Iran. In short, what are the interests of the protagonists, and are they important enough for those nations to take the fateful step into the chaos of battle?

First off, because oil and gas are involved, a war would have global ramifications. Iran supplies China with about 15 percent of its oil, and India with 10 percent. It is a major supplier to Europe, Turkey, Japan and South Korea, and it has the third largest oil reserves and the second largest natural gas reserves in the world. Some 17 million barrels per day pass through the narrow Strait of Hormuz, a significant part of the globe’s energy supply.

In short, the actors in this drama are widespread and their interests as diverse as their nationalities.

According to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Iran is building nuclear weapons that pose an “existential” threat to Israel. But virtually no one believes this, including the bulk of Tel Aviv’s military and intelligence communities. As former Israeli Chief of Staff Dan Halutz said recently, Iran “is not an existential” threat to Israel. There is no evidence that Iran is building a bomb and all its facilities are currently under a 24-hour United Nations inspection regime.

But Israel does have an interest in keeping the Middle East a fragmented place, riven by sectarian divisions and dominated by authoritarian governments and feudal monarchies. If there is one lesson Israel has learned from its former British overlords, it is “divide and conquer.” Among its closest allies were the former dictatorships in Egypt and Tunisia, and it now finds itself on the same page as the reactionary monarchies of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC): Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Qatar, and Oman.

Iran is not a military threat to Israel, but it is a political problem, because Tel Aviv sees Teheran’s fierce nationalism and independence from the U.S. and Europe as a wildcard. Iran is also allied to Israel’s major regional enemy, Syria—with which it is still officially at war— and the Shiite-based Hezbollah in Lebanon, Hamas in Gaza, and the Shiite-dominated government in Iraq.

In the Netanyahu government’s analysis, beating up on Iran would weaken Israel’s local enemies and at little cost. Tel Aviv’s scenario features a shock and awe attack, followed by a United Nations mandated ceasefire, with a maximum of 500 Israeli casualties. The Iranians have little capacity to strike back, and, if they did attack Israeli civilian centers or tried to close the Hormutz Strait, it would bring in the Americans.

Of course that rose-colored scenario is little more than wishful thinking. Iran is not likely to agree to a ceasefire—it fought for eight long years against Iraq—and war has a habit of derailing the best-laid plans. In real life it will be long and bloody and might well spread to the entire region.

Iran’s leaders use a lot of bombast about punishing Israel if it attacks, but in the short run, there is not a lot they could do, particularly given the red lines Washington has drawn. The Iranian air force is obsolete, and the Israelis have the technology to blank out most of Teheran’s radar and anti-aircraft sites. Iran could do little to stop Tel Aviv’s mixture of air attacks, submarine-fired cruise missiles, and Jericho ballistic missiles.

For all its talk about “everything being on the table.” The Obama administration appears to be trying to avoid a war, but with the 2012 elections looming, would Washington remain on the sidelines? On the “yes” side are polls indicating that Americans would not look with favor on a new Middle East war. But on the “no” side are a united front of Republicans, neo-conservatives, and the American Israeli Political Action Committee pressing for a confrontation with Iran.

Israeli sources suggest that Netanyahu may calculate that in the run-up to the 2012 American elections, an Israeli attack might force the Obama Administration to back a war and/or damage Obama’s re-election chances. It is no secret that there is no love lost between the two leaders.

But the U.S. also has a dog in this fight, and one not all that different than Israel’s. American hostility to Iran dates back to Teheran’s seizure of its oil assets from Britain in 1951. The CIA helped overthrow the democratically elected Iranian government in 1953 and install the dictatorial Shah. The U.S. also backed Saddam Hussein’s war on Iran, has had a longstanding antagonistic relationship with Syria, and will not talk with Hezbollah or Hamas. Tel Aviv’s local enemies are Washington’s local enemies.

When the Gulf monarchs formed the GCC in 1981, its primary purpose was to oppose Iranian influence in the Middle East. Using religious division as a wedge, the GCC has encouraged Sunni fundamentalists to fight Shiites in Lebanon, Iraq and Syria, and blocked the spread of the “Arab Spring” to its own turf. When Shiites in Bahrain began protesting over a lack of democracy and low wages, the GCC invaded and crushed the demonstrations. The GCC does not see eye-to-eye with the U.S. and Israel on the Palestinians—although it is careful not to annoy Washington and Tel Aviv—but the GCC is on the same page as both capitals concerning Syria, Lebanon and Iran.

The European Union (EU) has joined the sanctions, although France and Germany have explicitly rejected the use of force. Motivations in the EU range from France’s desire to reclaim its former influence in Lebanon to Europe’s need to keep its finger on the energy jugular vein. In brief, it isn’t all about oil and gas but a whole lot of it is, and, as CounterPunch’s Alexander Cockburn points out, oil companies would like to see production cut and prices rise. A war would accomplish both.

Iran will be the victim here, but there will be some who would take advantage of a war. An attack would unify the country around what is now a rather unpopular government, allow the Revolutionary Guard to crush its opposition, and give cover to the current drive by the Ahmadinejad government to cut subsidies for transportation, housing and food. A war would cement the power of the most reactionary elements of the current regime.

There are other actors in this drama—China, Russia, India, Turkey, and Pakistan for starters, none of whom support a war—but whether they can influence events is an open question. In the end, Israel may just decide that its interests are served by starting a war, and that the U.S. will go along because it is much of the same mind.

Or maybe this is all sound and fury signifying nothing?

The sobering thought is that the three most powerful actors in this drama—Israel, the U.S. and its European allies, and the Gulf Cooperation Council—have many of the same interests, and share the belief that force is an effective way to achieve one’s goals.

On such illusions are tragedies built.



Filed under Iran, Israel, Middle East, Military, Oil

21 responses to “Iran, Israel and the U.S.: The Slide To War

  1. Pingback: ایران، اسرائیل و آمریکا: لغزش به سوی جنگ « بامدادی

  2. Good analysis, but maybe absent the most important consideration: as Iraq and Libya attempted, Iran is dropping the petrodollar. This Washington/Wall St. cannot permit because, if enough nations do so, the dollar will lose its global reserve currency status, fall to its real value – maybe 20% of its current artificial peg – and the US economy in turn goes to hyperinflation and collapse. I don’t doubt that Israel will, one way or another, precipitate this war, but Iran will certainly be heavily attacked by the US as well. Silver lining: if Iran can close the Hormuz Straits for, say, more than a month or so, a sustained oil price at >$200/barrel may have the same effect…and bring down the Empire itself. Then again, we could be looking at another 1914, in which case none of this will matter.


  3. Execelent facts my friend, realizar encuestas remuneradas I just didn’t know what you published, excellent share. encuestas remuneradas


  4. Forget Israel, the real goal is the oil in the Caspian Basin which went up for grabs with the collapse of communist Russia in 1991. The Caspian Basin is home to three trillion dollars worth of oil and natural gas. The US has been building a military vice around the Caspian Basin ever since the collapse. Israel has been a pain in the ass for US interests in the Middle East ever since its conception. It was a problem for FDR and every president since then. Israel’s importance tjo the US is greatly overrated. the US has not spent trillions of dollars building military bases around the Caspian Basin to stop in its plans to get the oil in the Caspian Basin by not attacking Iran. The US will attack Iran to get the oil, it’s a matter of when not if. If you look at a map of the area you will that all the nations we are now occupying are all near the Caspian Basin from Iraq to Afghanistan. You can look here where I posted two maps, one of our military bases and one of proposed oil lines from the Caspian Basin, it’s all rather obvious.


  5. Sorry, I meant 12 trillion dollars worth of oil and gas not 3 trillion.


  6. Hello there, You have done an incredible job. I’ll certainly digg it and personally recommend to my friends. I am sure they’ll be benefited from this web site.


  7. Spot on with this write-up, I actually think this web site needs rather more consideration. I’ll probably be once more to learn way more, thanks for that info.


  8. Wonderful goods from you, man. I’ve understand your stuff previous to and you’re just too magnificent. I actually like what you have acquired here, certainly like what you’re stating and the way in which you say it. You make it enjoyable and you still care for to keep it smart. I cant wait to read far more from you. This is actually a great web site.


  9. As a Newbie, I am permanently exploring online for articles that can be of assistance to me. Thank you


  10. I really glad to find this website on bing, just what I was searching for : D besides saved to bookmarks .


  11. I conceive other website owners should take this website as an example, very clean and superb user friendly design and style.


  12. Awesome share! Appreciate it!


  13. I found the info on this blog beneficial.


  14. often. Did you hire out a designer to create your theme? Superb work!


  15. I usually do not drop many responses, but i did some searching and wound up here Iran, Israel and the U.S.: The Slide To War |. And I do have 2 questions for you if you do not mind. Is it only me or does it give the impression like a few of these remarks appear like they are left by brain dead folks? 😛 And, if you are posting on other sites, I would like to follow everything new you have to post. Would you make a list of all of all your communal sites like your linkedin profile, Facebook page or twitter feed?


    • I post on Foreign Policy In Focus and the Berkeley Daily Planet, but basically the same posts as on my blog site. I don’t have a linkin (and I am digging in my heels) but I do have a profile on the blog site. Don’t birds twitter?



  16. I’ve been recently lacking for a long time, but now I recall the reason why I used to adore this web site. Thanks, I am going to try to check back with greater frequency. How often an individual improve your website?


  17. You have brought up a very superb details , appreciate it for the post.


  18. What’s Happening i am new to this, I stumbled upon this I have found It positively useful and it has aided me out loads. I hope to contribute & aid other users like its helped me. Good job.


  19. it was nice to read your blog. the thoughts are very well laid out and it was refreshing to read. i was able to find the information that i was looking for. thanks. lista de emails lista de emails lista de emails lista de emails lista de emails


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s