Foreign Policy in Focus
April 14, 2006
When India’s Finance Minister Palaniappan Chidambaram presented the government’s budget this past February, he trumpeted the country’s vault into modernity. Economic growth is 8.1 percent and is projected to rise as high as 10 percent next year. India has completed its “Golden Quadrilateral,” a multi-lane highway that links New Delhi in the north, Calcutta in the east, Chennai in the south, and Mumbai in the west. The collective wealth of India’s 311 billionaires jumped 71 percent in the last year.
“Growth will be our mount,” the Minister told the Parliament, “equity will be our companion, and social justice will be our destination.”
But for India’s rural and urban poor, the chasm between them and the wealthy only got wider and deeper. Last year, India slipped from 124 out of 177 countries to 127, according to the United Nations Human Development Index. Life expectancy is seven years less than in China, and 11 less than in Sri Lanka.
Mortality for children under five, according to a United Nations Development Report, is almost three times China’s rate, almost six times Sri Lanka’s, and greater than in Bangladesh and Nepal.
The divide is best summed up in a searing editorial by Palagummi Sainath, India’s leading independent journalist. In an April 1 opinion piece in The Hindu, Sainath contrasts the two worlds that increasingly make up the second most populous nation on earth.
“Farm suicides in Vldharbha crossed 400 this week. The Sensex (stock exchange) crossed the 11,000 mark. And Lakme Fashion Week issues over 500 media passes to journalists. All three are firsts. All happened the same week. And each captures in a brilliant if bizarre way a sense of where India’s Brave New World is headed. A powerful measure of disconnect. Of the gap between the haves and the have-mores on the one hand, and the dispossessed and the desperate, on the other.”
For more than a decade, the Mumbai-based journalist has criss-crossed India by train, bicycle and foot, chronicling the daily lives of the poor. He writes about people like Ganesh Bhimrao Thakre, a small farmer in Vidharbha who struck hard times. His daughter got cholera, his wife had an eye operation, and his son was forced to drop out of college for financial reasons. Desperate and unable to get a loan, he played Bhishi, a sort of Ponzi scheme where farmers pool money to try and win a monthly jackpot.
So he committed suicide. Most farmers kill themselves by drinking pesticides. Thakre hung himself.
There are literally thousands like him in the countryside, where in states like Orissa, Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh and Bihar the “average” income is considerably below the national rural poverty line of $650 a year. Stories like the death of Ganesh Thakre do not make Sainath a popular man in the corridors of power where “India Shining” is the slogan. The government is less interested in helping the poor, as it is increasing military spending and building a “blue water” navy.
India has launched a 30-year program to build a fleet capable of projecting power into the South China Sea and Indian Ocean. It has purchased Jaguar bombers from Britain and is negotiating to purchase 66 Hawk fighter-bombers for $1.43 billion. The price of a single Hawk could supply a lifetime of clean drinking water to 1.5 million people.
The new budget is a case study in skewed priorities.
Under the former right wing Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) government, social support networks were systematically dismantled, and social expenditures declined from 22.9 percent to 19.7 percent.
But the center-left Congress-UPA government’s budget is only marginally better. Social expenditures will rise just 1.2 percent. Education will jump a paltry .4 percent, and health funding will go from 4.4 percent to 4.9 percent. According to the Finance Minister, “Growth is the best antidote to poverty.”
The “growth” formula is the so-called “Washington Consensus” of open markets and foreign investment, which has accelerated the divide between rich and poor from Terra del Fuego to West Africa. Latin America is presently in the process of dismantling much of the neo-liberal “consensus” that dominated economic systems from Mexico to Argentina throughout the ‘80s and ‘90s
In India, “growth” has been restricted to a relatively narrow band of industries, like high tech. In the countryside, where 75 percent of the population lives, living conditions have worsened.
A World Bank study in 2004 found that while the number of Indian millionaires rose so did the number of poor. According to a UN Development Report, inequality in India has grown faster in the last 15 years than in the last 50 years.
The Report also found that rural poverty alleviation schemes generally ended up being used in the interests of the wealthy.
In his searing book “Everyone Loves a Good Drought,” Sainath exposed how the elites manipulate rural aid to enrich themselves and impoverish small farmers. Wealthy landowners used government aid during a drought to dig wells so deep that they drained off the water small farmers were using. In exchange for water, the small farmers had to grow what the wealthy farmers wanted them to grow, generally export crops like cotton and rice.
Most small farmers quickly found themselves squeezed between low prices for their crops and high prices for seed and fertilizer. Many had no choice but to turn to the local sahucar, moneylenders who charge usurious rates of 60 percent or higher. “Bank don’t loan money to small farmers,” says Sainath, “although you can get all you want to buy a Mercedes.”
In 1991, 26 percent of rural households were in debt. By 2003 that had jumped to just under 50 percent, although in some states, like Andhra Pradesh, four fifths of the farmers were in arrears. Tens of millions of small farmers ended up losing their land, and became landless laborers. If they were lucky and had a union, they made $1 a day. If they were not, they made as little as 33 cents per day.
In contrast, each of those 311 billionaires takes in about $17.5 million a day.
Since the government has cut back on irrigation aid and dried up most of the money for small loans, more and more farmers have little choice but to use the sahucars. The lenders—who many times are big land owners—forced many farmers to sign a document “selling” their land to the suhucar. According to Sainath, many times those documents are not torn up even after the debt is paid.
While some farmers who lose their land become agricultural day laborers, large numbers migrate to the cities in search of services and jobs. But services have been cut, and the jobs are mainly for the literate and the well schooled. In rural areas, 38 percent of males, and 57 percent of women are illiterate.
The miserly increase in health spending is particularly burdensome to the rural poor. Medical care is the second most common cause of rural debt, and close to the 25 percent of the population do not seek medical care because they cannot afford it.
As a share of its GDP, India spends less on health care than countries like Cambodia, Myanmar, Togo, Sudan, Guinea and Burundi. According to a UN Human Development Report, “Some of India’s southern cities may be in the midst of a technological boom, but one in ever 11 Indian children dies in the first five years of life from want of low-technology, low-cost interventions.”
The medical situation is deepened by the food crisis that many Indians endure. A study by Professor Utsa Patnaik found that per person food availability is lower now than it was during the horrendous Bengal famine of 1942-43.
It is common for rural family members to alternate days when they eat. The result is that 46.7 percent of Indian children are underweight, and 44.9 percent of them are growth stunted. In comparison, China—which also has a wide and growing gap between rich and poor—those figures are 10 percent and 14.2 percent, respectively.
Ganesh Thakre’s wife, Rekha, told Sainath that the family had reached the point, “Where when we take our household wheat to the mill, we leave it there until we can pay the miller the tiny amount it takes to grind the flour.”
Urban slum dwellers fare little better. In the same week that the fashion shows and the stock market were doing well, almost 5,000 urban shanties were torn down in Mumbai.
“In the village we demolish their lives,” writes Sainath, “in the city their homes.”